"There will be big news soon..."
"I've known this insider info for a while, but I'd rather not say."
Anyone scrolling through social media feeds recently has likely seen statuses like these. The ironic twist is that posts lacking concrete information, facts, or even hints about who or what they concern end up garnering massive views and engagement.
The question is, why do seemingly meaningless content posts go viral almost every time? This phenomenon is certainly a result of both human behavior and algorithmic functions.
Why do people enjoy posting that they know secrets but refuse to share them? Because it can be a form of displaying power.
In a social media world where everyone has an equal voice, declaring "I have insider information" is the easiest way to elevate oneself or a page above the general public.
It creates an image of being the center of a social network, and saying "I know but won't say" reinforces the control held over that information.
Readers' reactions have clearly changed. About 4-5 years ago, when gossip boards or popular pages posted teasers like this, netizens would comment in queues saying "setting up to wait" or "give us a hint, please."
But in the 2026 online world, where people crave speed and straightforward information, some of the excitement has turned into frustration.
We now see comeback comments like "Then why say anything?" or "If you won't tell, don't say anything." The irony is that even when netizens don't get the information they want and lash out at the poster, this only makes the post trend more and become an even bigger sensation.
Why do posts we criticize with "Then why say anything?" still flood our feeds?
Time magazine once published an analysis explaining how social media platforms work: engineers assign a point value to every user action on a post.
Whether liking, commenting, or sharing, the algorithm predicts which type of interaction is most likely. It then multiplies and sums these points into an Anticipated Engagement score to decide which posts to push into our feeds.
Importantly, different interactions carry different weights. Sharing or argumentative commenting carries more weight than just liking.
This is why platforms don't care whether quotes or comments are insults or praise. The algorithm doesn't know if we're annoyed inside.
As long as we keep watching and typing complaints, the platform interprets the post as highly effective and engaging. The result is that posters gain views, engagement, and possibly revenue, while we endure frustrating junk feeds.
Time compared this system to junk food: once we start clicking, commenting, or engaging with posts that hold back information, the algorithm serves us more similar content.
It’s a cycle that turns our once bright feeds into a conveyor belt of digital junk, draining our energy daily.
Ultimately, understanding how this cycle works is the first step to stopping it. In an age where engagement is the most valuable currency online, the solution might not be to comment "Then why say anything?"
But to "scroll past" and behave as if those posts do not exist at all.
ReferencesTIME
#ThairathPlus #Thairath