To better understand violence in society and reduce the psychological impact on those involved, Thairath Plus invites everyone to revisit the content from an academic seminar.‘Lessons Learned from the Psychology of Mass Shootings: Origins, Solutions, and Prevention’.This seminar was held on 18 February 2020 by the Faculty of Psychology at Chulalongkorn University to help us understand the roots of violence, ways to heal the psychological wounds of victims and those around them, as well as mechanisms to cut off opportunities and motives for criminal acts (organized following the loss experienced in Korat).
Associate Professor Dr. Somphot Iamsupasit, a behavioral psychologist and former dean of the Faculty of Psychology at Chulalongkorn University, explained that violent behavior and aggression can occur in normal people as they are survival instincts. When suitable factors or triggers are present, violent or aggressive behavior can emerge. However, the key lies in self-control, especially in today's society which fosters impulsiveness due to the fast pace of life and lack of discipline and patience training.
Additionally, individuals with high aggression tendencies often have psychological traits such as pessimism, feeling victimized, and displaying oppositional behavior. They may blame others for problems or have an interest in violent content, although this is not always the case. These traits represent preliminary aggressive behavior, but if such behaviors recur, immediate consultation with experts is advised.
Dr. Nathee Jitsawang, a criminologist, explained that crimes can arise from two main interacting factors:‘Motivation’(a person’s decisions and behavior) and‘Opportunity’(timing, place, and access to weapons).
Dr. Nathee further explained, based on research and studies abroad regarding such events, that common offender traits include being introverted, experiencing discrimination or isolation without guidance, having suffered abuse in childhood leading to anger, or having an affinity for and exposure to violence, as well as seriously studying, recording methods, and planning from past incidents.
Regarding opportunities for crime, particularly in countries with high weapon ownership rates like the United States or Thailand, violent incidents or deaths involving weapons are easier to occur. In countries with strict weapon control such as Japan, South Korea, or Singapore, offenders tend to use other weapons or methods like knives or toxic gas.
Dr. Nathee stated that prevention must address both aspects simultaneously:‘Cutting Opportunities’by controlling the environment and access to weapons, and‘Eliminating Motivation’by avoiding rules that are exploitative and providing outlets for pressure release. If we can control the environment, no matter how aggressive a person is, such incidents will not occur or will be less severe than currently experienced.
This also involves the family institution instilling self-control from childhood and building resilience to handle problems. If environmental control is not possible, then control must start with our own minds.
Assistant Professor Dr. Natthasuda Taepan, a counseling psychologist, suggested beginning with understanding emotions that may arise afterward, such as fear or guilt, to avoid questioning that worsens victims when they are not ready. For self-healing, start by accepting the emotions and feelings, recognizing panic, and talking openly with trusted people when ready. This can alleviate feelings and improve self-understanding, then transform fear into energy to do meaningful things to regain control over life.
Dr. Natthasuda also explained that when caring for someone overwhelmed by negative feelings, close people can help by showing understanding, staying by their side, and being ready to listen when they want to talk. They should reduce curiosity and try to see the world from the affected person’s perspective.
However, psychological effects from severe events can linger for 3–6 months. If symptoms like loss of appetite, insomnia, or paranoia persist beyond 6 months, professional help should be sought. For children with limited communication skills, signs of regression such as bedwetting or changes in behavior like bullying younger siblings warrant immediate consultation with child psychiatrists or psychologists.
Dr. Natthasuda advised that if we encounter messages glorifying offenders as heroes or justice seekers, we should avoid engaging in arguments that escalate the situation. Instead, step back to reflect on our feelings. If concerned, listen through casual conversations without judgment or making them feel isolated, and try to understand their experience. This helps us respond appropriately.
Additionally, observe and assess whether the person exhibits behaviors similar to offenders or shows tendencies toward such acts. If risks are identified, they should be taken to specialists immediately.
Therefore, feeling sympathy upon learning that an offender was once a victim is not unusual, as it reflects human empathy. However, we must recognize that while victims have the right to respond, the methods must be appropriate, not escalating into violence, and must be mindful self-defense. Ultimately, what we should offer each other is not just sympathy but understanding and mutual opportunities.
Associate Professor Dr. Panraphee Suthiwarn, former dean of the Faculty of Psychology at Chulalongkorn University, explained that the family’s role in preventing aggression includes parents consistently paying attention and listening, whether to problems or daily life matters. Dr. Somphot further added that the family should be the starting point for teaching children self-control, including managing emotions and solving problems appropriately.