After the famous couple, actress Noon Ramida Prapasornobol, and actor-singer Louis Scott, tearfully held a press conference about losing their unborn child due to uterine rupture, which required surgery to save Noon's life. Fans sent much support to the couple, but at the same time, there was public criticism of the obstetrician managing Noon's pregnancy, questioning why a cesarean was not done at 36 weeks gestation.
Regarding this matter, Dr. Khongkwan Fujitiniran, or Doctor Khongkwan, posted a strong reply to netizens criticizing the case: “If you know it’s risky, why not do a C-section at 36 weeks? Is the doctor incompetent? If there’s no indication, no doctor performs an early cesarean. The risk in this case was a prior uterine surgery. Does that mean all first-time C-sections are risky, and all second pregnancies must be delivered at 36 weeks?”
She continued with many comments under the post, such as: "A thin uterus cannot be measured by ultrasound," "Some people think they know more than doctors, these Thai netizens," "It was an unavoidable accident; there were no warning signs, and tests showed nothing, but it’s truly a heartbreaking loss," "Comments like ‘I delivered my baby safely at 36 weeks’—stop, that’s a different case!" and "Full term is 37 weeks or more; 36 weeks is considered premature."
Looking at the comments, some netizens agreed with Doctor Khongkwan’s post, but one commented: “If it were 14 days later, maybe she could have stayed in the hospital waiting, getting checked daily to monitor symptoms, resting quietly so that if an emergency happened, a timely C-section could be performed. Just my personal thought.” Doctor Khongkwan replied, “Realistically, if there were no symptoms, who would stay in hospital waiting for 14 days?”
Click to readmore entertainment newshere