Several Google employees have chosen to resign from the company because they cannot accept Google’s contract with the U.S. military to use the company’s AI technology for military purposes.
BBC reported that some employees and researchers at Google DeepMind, Google’s AI development company, have resigned or are in the process of resigning to protest the company’s contract with the U.S. military, which plans to use AI technology across various military sectors. They view this as violating the company’s ethical principles.
Sophia Liguori, a research engineer based in London, broke her agreement prohibiting criticism of the company to speak to BBC. She said she feels “ashamed” that Google is promoting the use of AI in military operations.
“Realizing that my company is increasingly pushing AI systems into military operations makes me feel ashamed to work at Google,” Ms. Liguori said. “I disagree with this direction, and it has caused me to lose trust that the company will be honest about the ethical values it once declared.”
“In principle, I am not allowed to criticize Google for life,” she said, but decided to speak out because she “believes it is important for this to be known, and stating facts is not the same as criticism.” She added that at Google, “people fear retaliation and worry about risking their careers. You feel watched and unable to speak freely.”
Meanwhile, Andreas Kirsch, an AI researcher who also resigned from Google DeepMind, believes Google’s oversight system is not strict enough to safely allow AI use in secret military missions.
“I believe Google’s governance and controls are insufficient or ineffective to use AI safely and responsibly in military and classified environments,” he said, adding this also applies to “the safe development of advanced artificial intelligence in the future.”
He warned, “It appears Google does not have the right to control or veto how the Pentagon uses AI, and seems to have limited visibility into how it is deployed.”
At the same time, an anonymous Google DeepMind employee expressed concern that people at Google fear retaliation and losing their career prospects if they speak out, though many ethics-focused employees have resigned. Some see this as a “generational transition” with younger staff replacing them.
This movement follows the U.S. government signing contracts with several tech companies including Google, OpenAI, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, and others to promote making the government a “combat force led by AI” under the leadership of U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
A Google spokesperson emphasized, “We have specific channels allowing employees to safely raise concerns ranging from business ethics to corruption, and we have strict workplace policies to prevent any form of retaliation.”
Google also confirmed, “We work with government organizations worldwide and follow consistent processes to review and contract these agreements, including adherence to acceptable use policies and our AI principles.”
However, many experts, including Sarah Choker, former head of OpenAI’s geopolitics team, have expressed concern about current military AI use. “AI compresses the time operators have to make decisions because it works much faster than humans, which is extremely risky in high-pressure environments.”
“When you have hundreds of targets selected by AI and only a short time, it is impossible for human operators to meaningfully check AI results for errors.”
There are also worries about the $1.2 billion Project Nimbus contract Google has with the Israeli military and government. A documentary film, NAZA, released this year claims Israel used AI systems to identify targets in Gaza Strip attacks, causing many deaths. Israel denies the documentary’s allegations as distorted.
Mr. Kirsch said, “Current AI models are not robust enough, and I don’t think they were trained for this type of mission.”
Follow international news:https://www.thairath.co.th/news/foreign
Source:bbc