The Election Commission’s referendum debate featured representatives from nine political parties. Nikorn emphasized that the constitutional amendment is to benefit the people and does not affect royal powers. Chaiwut responded by accusing proponents of using the people as a pretext to free corrupt politicians.
On 27 Jan 2026 GMT+7, the Election Commission (EC) held a forum for expressing opinions regarding the planned referendum. Representatives from nine political parties participated at the Centra Life Chaengwattana Hotel, where they shared their views. Among those supporting a new constitution were five parties: Phumjai Thai, Phaendin Tham, Pentham, Phlawat, and Okat Mai parties. Meanwhile, the opposing side included Rak Chart, Prachathai, Ruam Thai Sang Chart, Mai, and Anakhot Thai parties. The Anakhot Thai Party withdrew from participation. Each party had two rounds to express opinions: first for 5 minutes, then 3 minutes.
Nikorn Jamnong, a party-list candidate from Phumjai Thai, reaffirmed his party’s position supporting a new constitution, stressing it must follow key principles: state security, respect for the monarchy, and alignment with the people's will. Based on his party’s experience in both executive and legislative branches, he noted the current constitution has several structural limitations. It lacks connection with the people, and many of its provisions are too rigid, adversely affecting citizens. He emphasized this is not a blank check: chapters 1 and 2 will not be amended, nor will any changes affecting royal powers be supported, either directly or indirectly. The goal is to improve rules for the people's benefit.
On the other hand, Chaiwut Thanakmanusorn, leader of the Rak Chart Party and prime ministerial candidate, argued that the 2017 constitution poses no problems for the public or politics. Those pushing for amendments often use the people as an excuse. Amending the entire constitution would remove limitations on dealing with corrupt politicians. He believes some proponents have hidden agendas aiming for political gain, affecting institutions and national security. He asserted the country’s current problems are not caused by the constitution.
Some opponents expressed that the Election Commission’s referendum question is too broad, preventing voters from properly comparing future benefits and drawbacks due to unclear details. They suggested allowing amendments on specific problematic provisions instead.
The Election Commission broadcast the opinions of all nine political parties live via its Facebook page, allowing the public to watch the debate afterward.