The Secretary-General of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) revealed that the Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for the petition involving 44 former Move Forward MPs on April 24. The NACC is preparing to explain the dismissal of the 'Sak Siam' case, which contrasts with the Constitutional Court’s ruling, and noted that determining whether he can resume a political position falls under the Election Commission's authority.
At 11:15 a.m. on 16 April 2026 GMT+7. Mr. Surapong Intarathaworn, Secretary-General of the National Anti-Corruption Commission. He revealed at the Government House the progress after the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) submitted the case files. The case involving 44 former Move Forward MPs. . They also proposed amendments to Section 112 of the Criminal Code to the Supreme Court on 9 April. Initially, the Supreme Court has scheduled a meeting to consider the petition on 24 April; the court will issue its decision accordingly.
Meanwhile, Mr. Surapong also commented on the NACC's decision to dismiss the case involving. Mr. Sak Siam Chidchob, former Minister of Transport. He was accused of secretly holding shares as a nominee in Buricharoen Construction Limited Partnership and submitting false asset declarations, which contradicted the Constitutional Court’s ruling that ended his ministerial tenure. Mr. Surapong said he has acknowledged the information and will issue a formal statement later. Because the content and ruling have significant implications, including explaining why the NACC made its decision.
When asked about clarity on whether Mr. Sak Siam could return to a political position, the NACC Secretary-General said this concerns the qualifications for holding political office, which is the Election Commission’s responsibility. The NACC’s role is complete. The constitution defines the qualifications for political office holders, and related agencies must assess any doubts or concerns regarding these qualifications. Some aspects relate to the NACC. He affirmed that the NACC’s explanations are well-founded. Regarding whether the matter needs to be referred back to the Constitutional Court, Mr. Surapong said it is a legal issue.
Additionally, Mr. Surapong discussed the DSI sending the iris scan case from the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to the NACC. He confirmed there are allegations, but the NACC must first verify who is involved and responsible. More time is needed to investigate who is accountable or connected.
When asked whether the DSI provided a large volume of information, Mr. Surapong said he has not reviewed the amount of documents yet. There are allegations involving state officials, but no individuals have been named. The NACC must examine these allegations and preliminarily identify those involved. He confirmed they are aware of some implicated parties but have not formally accepted the case yet—only preliminary examination is underway. When asked if any political figures are implicated, Mr. Surapong said he needs to review the details and requested time for officials to complete their work.