Srisuwan submitted a petition to the Ombudsman requesting the matter be referred to the Constitutional Court to determine whether the NACC’s ruling that Saksayam Chidchob did not intentionally conceal shares conflicts or contradicts the Constitutional Court’s decision.
At 10:00 a.m. on 27 April 2026 GMT+7, Mr. Srisuwan Janya . As the leader of the Love the Nation, Love the Land organization, he submitted a petition to the Ombudsman at the Ombudsman’s office, requesting that the matter be forwarded to the Constitutional Court to issue a ruling on whether the actions or decisions of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) in its ruling that Mr. Saksayam Chidchob while serving as a Member of Parliament and Minister of Transport, did not intentionally submit a false declaration of assets and liabilities, contradicts the 2017 Constitution, Section 211, Paragraph 4, in conjunction with Section 5.
This follows the Constitutional Court’s ruling No. 1/2024 on 17 January 2024 that Mr. Saksayam still retained shares and was a shareholder and owner of Buricharoen Construction Limited Partnership, and was involved in managing the shares or business of that partnership, which is an act prohibited by the Constitution, causing his ministerial status to terminate individually under Section 170, Paragraph 1 (5) of the Constitution.
Mr. Srisuwan stated, that the NACC’s ruling on 8 September 2025 that Mr. Saksayam did not intentionally submit false asset declarations was not publicly announced until 23 April 2026. The details in the announcement contained many suspicious points that directly contradict the Constitutional Court’s ruling No. 1/2024. Therefore, he brought all these facts to petition the Ombudsman to provide an opinion for referral to the Constitutional Court to determine whether the NACC’s ruling on this matter conflicts with Section 211, Paragraph 4, in conjunction with Section 5 of the Constitution, or to submit an opinion to the Administrative Court for consideration, investigation, and judgment according to administrative law.