"Teng" responded to the issue involving the husband of "Lawyer Jam" posting on Facebook that "Natthaphon" was unfaithful, stating that if the parliamentary ethics committee receives a complaint, it should follow due process. He urged neutrality. "Sophon" commented on the 400 billion baht loan decree, emphasizing that parliament should not protect wrongdoers in the case of "Chonnaphat." He confirmed full government scrutiny but expressed reluctance to expand the Constitutional Court's powers.
On 23 May 2026 at 14:00 in Nong Khaem district, Bangkok, Mr. Natthapong Ruangpanyawut, leader of the PCN party, campaigned to support Mr. Kittikun Kotchornjarupong, a PCN candidate for the local council. Mr. Natthapong said that overall, they want to make Bangkok a local area capable of solving problems with the people and genuinely improving their lives. He emphasized transparent budget spending. Particularly, local councilors have a direct role in reviewing issues. Nong Khaem faces problems with a waste facility emitting unpleasant odors affecting nearby residents. He believes the best people to understand these problems are those volunteering as council candidates.
Mr. Natthapong commented on the case involving Police Lieutenant Colonel Theerawat Panyanathamkul, former PCN party list MP candidate and husband of MP Sasinan Thamnitinun of the PCN party in Bangkok, who posted questions on Facebook about ethical misconduct, saying it was unbelievable that someone unfaithful to others' families still has a place in society. He said the matter concerns personal relationships and has not been ignored; discussions have taken place privately. Whether the matter will be brought to the party's disciplinary committee depends on whether a complaint is filed. If a complaint is submitted, the disciplinary process will proceed accordingly.
When asked if a complaint must be filed first, Mr. Natthapong said it depends. If it is clear that a party representative has committed a disciplinary offense, they would initiate proceedings even without a complaint. Sometimes investigations proceed on their own. In this case, he is not yet aware of all the facts; it is truly a personal matter that may require time for discussion.
When asked if MP Sasinan's previous role on the disciplinary committee might reduce the party's credibility, Mr. Natthapong said to focus on the current disciplinary committee instead. He believes the committee members are respected and credible, capable of ensuring MPs conduct themselves appropriately. Asked if he has spoken directly with both parties, he said party representatives have engaged in talks, though he himself has not yet spoken directly on this issue. Regarding potential ethics complaints in parliament about this matter, he said the process must proceed according to parliamentary ethics committee procedures.
Call for Neutrality from "Sophon," Parliamentary Speaker
Mr. Natthapong also commented on statements by Mr. Sophon Sarum, parliamentary speaker, who said the 400 billion baht loan decree must await a Constitutional Court ruling before introducing motions, and that the PCN party's proposal to set up a special committee to monitor spending is not urgent since the funds have not yet been used. Mr. Natthapong said that regardless of party affiliation, once someone becomes parliamentary speaker, they must act with neutrality and make decisions according to the rules straightforwardly. Claiming a matter is not urgent and waiting for the court's ruling before considering motions is an unacceptable excuse. He urged the speaker to perform his duties diligently and reminded that parliament's role is to scrutinize every budget baht. When asked about an upcoming motion on the land bridge project, Mr. Natthapong said that government-backed issues may be approved, while those the government does not want scrutinized might be delayed or blocked. This raises questions about whether the speaker truly remains neutral in handling parliamentary motions and agendas.
Affirms Parliament Should Not Protect Wrongdoers in "Chonnaphat" Case
Mr. Natthapong responded to Police General Sereepisuth Temeeyaves, leader of the Seri Ruam Thai party, who expressed disappointment on Facebook that the PCN party did not support a motion to investigate Mr. Anutin Charnvirakul, Prime Minister and Minister of Interior, regarding the Krodong incident, and suggested there might be underlying reasons. Mr. Natthapong said he is willing to discuss openly, especially with opposition parties, and knows that Mr. Sereepisuth genuinely wants to investigate. He has indicated willingness for the PCN party to co-sign such motions and has sent representatives to discuss multiple times. The PCN party is not unwilling to investigate and is ready to thoroughly scrutinize the government but must be cautious using mechanisms like the Constitutional Court to avoid expanding its powers.
Mr. Natthapong also addressed the case where the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) requested the parliament to issue a letter transferring custody of Mr. Chonnaphat Naksua, Songkhla MP from the Kla Tham party, with plans to bring the matter to parliament for opinion. He said each case must be considered individually. In this case, it is clear the person committed wrongdoing, so parliament should not protect him. Previously, requests for custody during sessions or approvals in meetings served as safeguards against political persecution. However, if the individual is guilty, there is no reason for parliament to offer protection.
When asked about speculation that Mr. Chonnaphat might no longer be in the country, Mr. Natthapong said it is the duty of those in the justice system to perform their roles with utmost integrity.