“Teng” criticized the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) for holding an irregular press conference that revealed the names of suspects but concealed those officially charged. He affirmed that the People’s Party legal team is preparing to sue any state officials who allow themselves to be used as tools to attack political opponents.
On 21 June 2025 GMT+7 at the parliament, Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, party-list MP and leader of the People’s Party as opposition leader in the House of Representatives, spoke about filing a request for the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to investigate the TH-AI Passport project. Nattapong emphasized Section 14, paragraph two of the Bid Rigging Act, which clearly states that the NACC does not need to wait for a formal complaint. If the NACC observes behavior suggesting bid rigging—such as locking specifications or pre-arranged bidding resulting in similar prices to fix a central price, especially involving state officials—it must investigate immediately and, if evidence is found, proceed with prosecution.
During recent joint committee meetings, NACC representatives were present. Nattapong said he asked whether the NACC would act based on behavior alone rather than strictly legalities, stressing that if suspicious conduct is observed, the NACC must investigate immediately without needing a formal complaint. Failure to do so would be neglecting duty and breaking the law. He reaffirmed that the NACC can proceed immediately.
Nattapong added that Rakchanok Srinok, party-list MP and chair of the House Budget Oversight Committee, announced in a meeting that committee observations would be sent to the NACC. These observations include detailed records illustrating suspicious behavior, which will serve as a basis for the NACC to act promptly. Meanwhile, the party will conduct parallel investigations, though this will take nearly another month.
He emphasized that the NACC must proactively act upon receiving observations without waiting for formal complaints. Regarding Digital Economy and Society Minister Chaiyachon Chidchob’s challenge to submit for investigation, Nattapong said such remarks are normal as the minister defends his innocence. However, he suggested that the minister could better prove his integrity by fully disclosing all project information transparently and reconsidering the project. Given public concerns and numerous irregularities in procurement, the project should be canceled and re-tendered under the procurement law to prevent damage to the state or public interest and to alleviate public suspicion.
When asked if this relates to the case of MP Pawut Pongwitthayaphanu, who disclosed the TH-AI Passport issue, Nattapong said he had already raised concerns. He noted that the DSI’s press conference was unusual because the suspects’ names were revealed, but no names of those officially charged were disclosed, which he found odd. He urged the DSI to be straightforward and transparent in all matters.
Asked whether they would counter-sue, Nattapong said the party’s legal team has discussed that if any state officials—especially those in the justice system—act unlawfully or become political tools to attack opponents, the party will gather all evidence and file lawsuits against every official abusing power.
Regarding MP Pawut’s absence from the Thursday parliamentary session despite previously citing heavy meetings, Nattapong said this should be asked directly to Pawut. He could not answer as he was unaware of Pawut’s activities that day.
When asked if the party had further discussions with Pawut, Nattapong said he would not call it an investigation but rather an internal inquiry. Initial information suggests there may be limitations in online transactions related to fund transfers, which does not necessarily imply dishonest intent. He emphasized the need to treat Pawut fairly.
Asked if the party would form a committee to investigate as in previous suspected cases, Nattapong said they have established a fact-finding team. He consulted with party secretary Pichan Chaowaphatwong, noting that so far no warrants have been issued as in other cases, so this is not a disciplinary matter. It might not be appropriate to call it an investigation but rather an internal review to ensure fairness. The party is not idle; it has escalated internal checks and set up a team to uncover facts and request Pawut’s explanations.
When asked about the 28 million baht received in Pawut’s account and whether the source was questioned, Nattapong said Pawut trades in commodities like gold. He believes it is best for Pawut to explain the details and the origin of the funds himself.