The Chairman of the Election Commission explained the reasons for dismissing allegations 1 and 2, stating that witness code 16/26 is unreliable and no financial irregularities were found. He plans to disclose the names of 77 accused persons entering court proceedings, responding to former commissioners by noting that having once been part of the same institution, they should preserve its integrity.
On 14 Sep 2026 at 16:00 GMT+7 at the Election Commission office, Mr. Narong Klanwarin, Chairman of the Election Commission, explained the reasons for considering the corruption case file.Regarding the Senate election.Specifically concerning allegations 1 and 2, he confirmed that witness code 16/26 lacks sufficient credibility and that the accused could not be deemed guilty under allegation 1 based on this witness.
Mr. Narong stated that after reviewing the evidence, some witnesses showed credibility issues, especially those who changed their testimony. Such witnesses have previously been sanctioned by courts. He added that, having served as a judge, he emphasizes weighing witness credibility, considering political background, consistency of testimony, and timing of testimony after the incident.
Regarding witness code 16/26, Mr. Narong said that background checks reveal a prior 11-year prison sentence for embezzlement.Specifically involving the Teachers’ Savings Cooperative.The embezzlement amounted to nearly 500 million baht, and the witness is currently politically disqualified due to an ethics case, so his background and credibility must be considered in weighing the evidence.
Mr. Narong stated that personally, he cannot accept that the accused committed the offense under allegation 1, since financial investigations of the accused group revealed no irregularities. Although phone contact was found, it could not be confirmed what was discussed.
Regarding a meeting at the Pullman Hotel after the Senate election, witnesses mentioned meetings with Mr. Newin Chidchob and Mr. Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, but no clear details or evidence indicate that the two met to take any action. Multiple possibilities exist, but no sufficient evidence indicates wrongdoing under allegation 1.
Mr. Narong emphasized that the key principle in his consideration is to rely on the evidence in the file and apply legal standards for weighing evidence. He noted he cannot speak for other commissioners but trusts all will exercise appropriate discretion and criteria in evaluating evidence.
Regarding allegation 1, since it was found unacceptable, this affects allegation 2 as well, which concerns receiving assistance in the Senate election. It remains unproven that named individuals received such assistance.
However, these individuals may still be considered under other allegations supported by different evidence, such as self-promotion, ballot preparation, or other activities. Consequently, 26 senators were subject to the Election Commission’s resolution to send their cases to the Supreme Court for consideration of election disqualification, with some possibly facing criminal charges under other allegations.
Mr. Narong Klanwarin, Chairman of the Election Commission, affirmed the Commission’s duty amid public criticism, saying that the Commission has no personal protection; the only safeguard is strict adherence to laws and regulations and the ability to clearly explain the reasons and evidence behind decisions to society.
Mr. Narong stated he believes the Commission’s work is clear and urged everyone to use discretion when following its work. He confirmed that the Commission never intends to act improperly or evade laws.
Since taking office 1 year and 14 days ago, efforts have been made to develop the organization. Several new commissioners, including Mr. Narong Rakroi, have devoted themselves to restoring public trust, which is still ongoing.
Mr. Narong acknowledged that people may have different views on the Commission’s work, asked for society’s patience, and requested long-term observation of the Commission’s performance.
Regarding the 77 accused individuals whose cases were sent to the Supreme Court, Mr. Narong said their names will be disclosed so that they are informed of the results and can prepare information for court procedures, including explanations and legal defense.
He emphasized that the Election Commission’s resolution to send the cases to the Supreme Court does not mean the 77 accused are guilty; rather, it is to submit the matter to the justice system for the court to examine facts and evidence.
Regarding former commissioners commenting or guiding public opinion on the current Commission’s work, Mr. Narong said that since they once belonged to the same Election Commission “home,” any wrongdoing should be addressed accordingly, and any correctness acknowledged accordingly.
. “Having once been part of this home, why not help preserve your original home?”