'Ruangkrai' pointed out that no irregularities have been found in the asset declaration of 'MP Idea.' He warned 'Rome' that accusing anyone of being a scammer requires evidence and cautioned about the risk of legal conflict of interest, noting the issue of 'accusing oneself while also conducting the investigation.' The tags are ['asset declaration', 'accusation', 'scammer', 'legal warning']
4 Oct 2026 GMT+7 The tags are ['date'] Mr. Ruangkrai Likitjawat The tags are ['person'] Former senator commented on the parliamentary debate of The tags are ['politics', 'parliament'] Mr. Rangsiman Rome The tags are ['person'] Member of Parliament (list) from the Prachachon Party who implicated the spouse of The tags are ['politics', 'accusation'] Ms. Suchada Sang Thanthap ('Idea') The tags are ['person', 'MP'] MP for Chaiyaphum from the Bhumjaithai Party, alleging involvement with a The tags are ['politics', 'scammer'] scammer network The tags are ['scammer', 'network'] The tags are []
Mr. Ruangkrai viewed that this debate might not be protected by parliamentary immunity because it involves accusing a third party, even if that person is the spouse of an MP. He added that if false information is given, criminal and ethical charges may follow, and further stated The tags are ['parliamentary immunity', 'defamation', 'ethics'] that after reviewing the asset and liability declarations submitted by MP Idea to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), no irregularities were found regarding the 3AC loan, since this was the MP's first asset declaration. The tags are ['asset declaration', 'NACC', 'loan']
At the same time, Mr. Ruangkrai noted an approximate 97 million baht investment difference, explaining that if this difference occurred before assuming office, it cannot be used to claim irregularities. Regarding the loan exceeding 1.3 billion baht, he said it appeared to be private sector investment aiming for profit with associated risks, essentially an individual's investment, so it cannot be deemed wrongful. The tags are ['investment', 'loan', 'asset declaration']
The tags are [] He added that if Mr. Rangsiman has evidence linking the matter to actual scammers, he should report directly to competent authorities such as the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) or the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) rather than making vague accusations in parliament hoping to claim immunity. This could be seen as a legal conflict of interest, meaning accusing oneself and also acting as investigator. The tags are ['legal advice', 'authorities', 'scammer']
When asked if MP Suchada could be held responsible, Mr. Ruangkrai said it was not clear at this stage because Mr. Rangsiman has not disclosed evidence and his statements were vague. If the information is false, defamation charges related to the dignity of office could arise. The tags are ['defamation', 'legal responsibility']
Regarding the dissemination of Ms. Suchada’s asset declaration by Ms. Rakchanok Srinok, list MP from the Prachachon Party, via Facebook, Mr. Ruangkrai said it is allowed. However, initial checks suggest the disclosure may be incomplete since the NACC website contains more pages. On questions about why debt from a bankrupt borrowing company was not written off and why it was reported to the NACC, he explained that since the lender is a natural person, they cannot write off debt like a legal entity, possibly indicating a misunderstanding. The tags are ['asset disclosure', 'Facebook', 'debt']
Mr. Ruangkrai also commented on Mr. Rangsiman’s plan to summon Ms. Suchada’s husband to provide information to the Parliamentary Committee on Law, Justice and Human Rights, saying that while he can be invited, he cannot be compelled to attend because he is not a government official and the committee may lack the authority to enforce attendance under the summons act. He emphasized that if this concerns scammers, the competent authorities should handle it, and false reporting carries criminal penalties. The tags are ['parliamentary committee', 'summons', 'legal authority']
Mr. Ruangkrai further explained that the reason he has not filed complaints amid social media rumors is that the facts are not yet clear, making legal reference difficult. He needs sufficient evidence first and concluded that those reviewing and filing complaints on asset declarations should thoroughly study the facts and law rather than rush to opinions based on social media trends. He added he is currently collecting asset declarations from all MPs and has not filed complaints as he is not seeking publicity like others. The tags are ['complaint', 'evidence', 'asset declaration', 'social media']}],