The Social Security Board appointment has hit a snag as the SSO announced that objections have been filed against the board member list. An investigation will be completed within 30 days. Meanwhile, the Progressive Social Security Facebook page is urging insured persons and employers to monitor the situation closely, fearing further delays.
On 13 Nov 2026 GMT+7, the Social Security Office updated progress on the election of employer and insured representatives to the Social Security Board. Following the announcement on 5 Nov 2026 GMT+7 of the top seven candidates from each side by the Election Commission, candidates and voters who have cast their votes had seven days to submit written objections regarding the appointed members. This deadline expired on 12 Nov 2026 GMT+7.
Objections were submitted within the allowed timeframe. Upon review, the objectors are eligible to file according to regulations. The Election Commission will consider the objections within 30 days. After their decision, the SSO will proceed with submitting the approved names for appointment. If the objections are dismissed, the SSO will propose the seven elected employer and seven insured representatives to the Minister of Labour for appointment. If upheld, the Commission will annul the names and promote alternate candidates, then the SSO will propose the updated list to the minister for appointment.
The Social Security Office confirmed that all procedures comply with legal criteria and timelines. Allowing objections is a key mechanism to verify accuracy and ensure confidence among all parties; it is not intended to delay appointments. The SSO is prepared to proceed promptly after legal reviews are complete to finalize board appointments.
The Progressive Social Security Facebook page commented that, following the official announcement of results, there is typically widespread media coverage to reassure the public. However, the objection process can extend beyond 30 days—up to 60 additional days, totaling 90 days—and does not include delays from ministerial approvals. The page questioned whether delays are due to other ongoing matters such as investments, IT, or medical issues. They urge insured persons and employers to watch closely to avoid being caught off guard.