Thairath Online
Thairath Online

The Crucial Reason Militaries Worldwide Refuse to Leave Fallen Soldiers on the Battlefield

Interview19 Dec 2025 10:21 GMT+7

Share article

The Crucial Reason Militaries Worldwide Refuse to Leave Fallen Soldiers on the Battlefield

Even if only the body remains, bringing comrades home is essential... This explores why armies around the world insist on recovering the bodies of fallen comrades who sacrificed their lives. It's about friendship and the endless pain felt by those left behind. However, in the harsh realities of war, sometimes "being alive" must take precedence over "death."  "Leave no man behind" is a guiding principle.

Bringing fallen soldiers home is not merely a humanitarian matter but relates to morale, covenant, and political strategy. These are the reasons behind the intense efforts to recover deceased soldiers' bodies and why, in some situations, comrades must be left behind.


1. Why is it essential to bring bodies home?

Modern militaries, especially those of the U.S. and Israel, follow the motto "Leave no man behind," meaning no soldier is left on the battlefield. This principle is important for several reasons:

  • Emotional covenant: Soldiers fight fully knowing that if injured, they will receive care, and if they die, their bodies will be returned to their families with honor.

  • Closure: For families, not recovering a body (Missing in Action - MIA) causes endless suffering. Conducting religious ceremonies helps families overcome their grief.

  • Value of soldiers' lives: In democracies, soldiers' lives are highly valued by the public. If the government abandons soldiers' bodies, it severely undermines public trust and political support.


Example: The U.S. Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA)

The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) is tasked with locating and identifying prisoners of war and missing persons from past conflicts (from World War II to present). They employ archaeologists, anthropologists, and DNA testing to recover bodies, even decades later.


2. Why must bodies sometimes be left on the battlefield?

No matter the desire to recover them, in the reality of war, some situations demand that "being alive" comes before "death."

World War I: The No Man's Land area

In trench warfare, the area between opposing trenches was a killing zone. Anyone exposed there was immediately targeted by machine guns or snipers.

  • Excessive risk: Sending recovery teams into open areas to retrieve bodies could result in many more casualties.

  • Environment: Bodies often get caught in barbed wire or buried deep in mud under constant artillery fire, making physical recovery nearly impossible.

  • Hygiene: When bodies are too numerous and cannot be recovered, they are sometimes left to decompose or buried by artillery shell explosions.


3. Tactical and cultural differences

The reasons why some countries leave bodies behind or handle them differently depend on several factors:

Factors

Recovery (e.g., U.S.)

Abandonment or battlefield burial (e.g., some past armies)

Capability

Has helicopters, planes, and large budgets

Resource shortages; transport limited to supplies and ammunition

Mobility speed

Emphasizes rapid movement; carrying bodies endangers the unit

Focuses on continuous advance; no stops for secondary missions

Casualty numbers

Losses in dozens or hundreds (high importance placed on bodies)

Losses in tens or hundreds of thousands (body management becomes overwhelming)


In ancient times or large-scale wars, when bodies could not be returned home, soldiers often created mass graves or buried the dead where they fell, recording locations to exhume later once the war ended.