Thairath Online
Thairath Online

Who Is Better? Comparing Onana vs Lammens as Manchester United Goalkeepers After Onana Seeks to Regain No. 1 Spot

Eurofootball26 Feb 2026 12:32 GMT+7

Share

Who Is Better? Comparing Onana vs Lammens as Manchester United Goalkeepers After Onana Seeks to Regain No. 1 Spot

Who is better? A statistical comparison of Onana vs Lammens as Manchester United goalkeepers after the former seeks to reclaim the No. 1 spot at Old Trafford.

On 26 Feb 2026 GMT+7, The Sun, a prominent British media outlet, revealed a comparative statistic between Andre Onana and Senna Lammens, the two goalkeepers for Manchester United, a well-known Premier League club, following reports that Onana is seeking to reclaim the No. 1 goalkeeper position at the "Red Devils."

Manchester United loaned out Andre Onana, who had made several mistakes leading to easy goals, to Trabzonspor, a Turkish league team, until the end of this season. Meanwhile, they brought in Senna Lammens from Royal Antwerp, who has performed well enough to become the permanent first-choice goalkeeper.

However, Andre Onana is preparing to challenge again for Manchester United's No. 1 spot, as Trabzonspor is unlikely to make his move permanent due to his high wages. Onana has declared his readiness to reclaim the position from Senna Lammens.

Recently, The Sun compared the Premier League goalkeeping statistics of both Andre Onana, the former No. 1, and Senna Lammens, the current No. 1, to provide a clearer picture of who has delivered better performances, as follows.

Onana vs Lammens Statistics as Manchester United Goalkeepers in the Premier League

Andre Onana

Played 72 matches

Conceded 102 goals

Conceded a goal every 63.5 minutes

18 clean sheets

57 catches

26 punches

4 errors leading to goals

6 errors leading to shots conceded

39% win rate

Senna Lammens

Played 21 matches

Conceded 26 goals

Conceded a goal every 72.7 minutes

5 clean sheets

18 catches

12 punches

0 errors leading to goals

0 errors leading to shots conceded

52% win rate