Big Tor, Chief of the Central Investigation Bureau, revealed that the Election Commission filed a complaint against citizens and media observers who photographed ballots during the election. The inquiry is ongoing, with evidence being collected. The Election Commission is scheduled for further testimony on 5 March. He emphasized that all actions follow the evidence and facts presented, focusing primarily on intent. He affirmed no fear of reputation damage and denied any external pressure.
At 10:30 a.m. on 2 March, at the press briefing room on the 2nd floor of the Crime Suppression Division headquarters, Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak Chaowanachai, Chief of the Central Investigation Bureau, provided an update on the Election Commission’s complaint filed on 25 February after citizens joined election observation in the Kan Na Yao district. The complaint alleged that the behavior obstructed officials’ work due to photographing that breached confidentiality.
Initially, investigators have scheduled the Election Commission to provide additional testimony on 5 March, along with submitting further evidence. The procedure requires interviewing all parties and collecting evidence based on statements from both complainants and the accused before determining if any offense occurred as claimed. He stressed that all decisions will be based strictly on facts.
When asked what evidence the Election Commission presented to show the accused’s wrongdoing, Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak said most is in the case file. Initially, it includes images reported in the news showing photos taken inside the voting booths, but detailed evidence remains within the case documents.
Asked if the accused’s intent might amount to public misinformation and how police view this, Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak said the Central Investigation Bureau works under a policy of impartiality, focusing solely on facts regardless of identities. They ensure fairness to both sides, investigating all evidence presented. If found guilty, summons or arrest warrants will be issued accordingly. Importantly, the intent behind the accused’s actions is a key factor considered before deciding whether to prosecute or dismiss charges, reaffirming that all actions follow the factual evidence from both parties.
When asked if police have the discretion to drop the case, Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak reiterated that decisions depend on the facts. Since police have accepted the complaint, insufficient evidence could lead to non-prosecution, but the process has just begun. They will continue investigations and collect all evidence thoroughly before concluding.
Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak affirmed that no one can pressure the Central Investigation Bureau or its investigators. He assured the public and media that their work strictly follows factual evidence. They are not afraid of reputation damage and have consistently gathered full evidence in many cases—even if courts sometimes dismiss them. All experiences are carefully recorded for future reference.