Big Tor, Commander of the Central Investigation Bureau, has ordered a full investigation into the “Tone Bangkae” case, gathering evidence against the renowned amulet expert. Authorities plan to use anti-money laundering laws to seize assets if repeated fraudulent behavior is found. He affirmed that fairness will be ensured for all parties following complaints against Pol. Maj. Gen. Jaroonkiat. He stressed that the Central Investigation Bureau conducts straightforward investigations, and anyone found guilty will face legal consequences. Meanwhile, Deputy Commissioner Nirandorn Leumsri spoke about photos showing “Tone Bangkae” with various individuals on multiple occasions.
At 3:30 p.m. on 7 May 2026, in front of the Crime Suppression Division building, Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak Chaowanasai, Commander of the Central Investigation Bureau, told reporters about the “Tone Bangkae” case previously reported in the news. He clarified that investigators have gathered a considerable amount of evidence from groups of amulet experts who filed complaints. However, since most evidence involves conversations, they must carefully compile it to clearly identify the specific amulets or individuals involved. During investigations reported in the media, some amulet experts have compensated victims and withdrawn their complaints. Nonetheless, authorities continue to collect evidence, finding some clear proof and receiving additional information from some victims. Currently, this evidence is being compiled into case files to pursue legal action against the accused parties.
Regarding the clarity about one of the three individuals mentioned in the news, the case details remain confidential due to the Central Investigation Bureau’s procedures in handling major cases. When a complaint is filed, investigations focus on three key points: 1) whether an offense actually occurred, 2) if the offense is criminal, and 3) identifying the offenders before proceeding with operations or filing charges. Especially in high-penalty cases requiring court approval for arrest warrants, the Central Investigation Bureau follows these steps thoroughly. Decisions on issuing warrants or summonses are pending as evidence is being carefully reviewed, considering whether some matters may be civil or criminal, relying primarily on the evidence provided by complainants.
Additionally, Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak said that besides testimonial evidence, investigators have scientific evidence that cannot be denied, such as chat data from the LINE application. If such data exists, it will be crucial and indisputable evidence. In fraud cases, it is common for complainants and defendants to give conflicting statements; thus, authorities must carefully collect evidence from both sides to clarify the facts.
Concerning the number of victims, which Pol. Maj. Gen. Jaroonkiat previously mentioned as nine, or rumors suggesting more, the commander said these details are part of the investigation files and cannot be disclosed at this time.
Regarding the alleged 20 million baht given to “Tone Bangkae,” conflicting statements remain between parties. The commander’s role is to analyze all facts alongside forensic evidence to determine whether each case constitutes fraud. Since fraud is a negotiable offense, perpetrators often negotiate compensation once legal action begins, causing the exact number of victims to remain uncertain.
Though “habitual fraud” is not directly cited as a charge, if repeated offenses are found, this can serve as a foundational crime for money laundering charges, leading to asset seizure processes against all offenders.
Pol. Lt. Gen. Natthasak affirmed that the Central Investigation Bureau does not harass anyone, and he has consistently emphasized this. He has known about the case since serving as Deputy Commissioner of the Central Investigation Bureau and instructed the case officers to expedite investigations continuously. Since becoming commander, many aspects have become public. Regarding whether Pol. Maj. Gen. Jaroonkiat could convene all three parties, the public can judge based on media reports, as statements from each side differ. Therefore, fairness must be maintained for all parties.
Pol. Maj. Gen. Jaroonkiat stated that some amulet experts requested meetings, but Tone’s side gave conflicting accounts. It is known that some amulet experts have lodged complaints with the Central Investigation Bureau. Whether this issue will affect Deputy Jaroonkiat’s career remains uncertain.
Currently, a complaint has been filed at Phahonyothin Police Station, where evidence must be gathered and action taken under the Anti-Corruption and Misconduct Prevention Act.
Regarding whether Pol. Maj. Gen. Jaroonkiat will be summoned for explanation, he has already been called for a discussion and provided information consistent with what was told to the media. On whether the commander feels pressured as a superior amid criticism harming the organization’s reputation, he affirmed that the Central Investigation Bureau conducts all legal matters transparently, ensuring fairness to both complainants and defendants. Conduct issues will be addressed based on facts, treating both Deputy Jaroonkiat and complainants fairly.
Later, at 3:30 p.m., at Prachaarak Building after a press briefing on an e-cigarette seizure, Ms. Supamas Isarapakdee, Minister attached to the Prime Minister’s Office, left the venue. Reporters tried to interview Deputy Commissioner Nirandorn Leumsri about widely shared social media photos showing a senior police official posing with Tone Bangkae on several occasions. Police public relations staff informed the deputy commissioner, who declined comment and directed them to interview at the Royal Thai Police headquarters instead before quickly leaving. Journalists then turned to interview the Central Investigation Bureau commander instead.