
Sai Mai Must Survive led a victim of a famous teacher known for the “Karma-Resolving Vision” to file a complaint with the Crime Suppression Division after being tricked into a lewd ritual under the claim of resolving karma. The victim vowed to pursue the case to the fullest and refused to settle.
On the afternoon of 7 May 2026, Mr. Ekaphop Luangprasert, founder of the Sai Mai Must Survive page, accompanied Mr. A (alias), 32, the victim, to the Crime Suppression Division (CSD) to file a complaint against a famous teacher after being sexually exploited under the pretense of resolving karma.
Mr. A said he suffered from chronic headaches, known as the “suicidal headache disease,” which caused intense suffering. Despite treatment at various public and private hospitals, his condition did not improve. Eventually, his mother saw a video of the treatment by the famous teacher on social media claiming to cure karmic illnesses completely. They decided to travel from their home in Chiang Mai province to meet this fortune teller at his large establishment resembling a meditation center.
Mr. A continued that upon arrival, the teacher questioned him about his problems and told him he had a lot of karma that needed clearing, saying he would be the last appointment of the day. Then, he was separated from his mother and taken alone into a private room where the door was locked tightly. The teacher cited a “Brahmin-Shivalinga” text and instructed him to remove his pants to check his karma.
The teacher then told him to touch three points on the teacher’s body—the inner thighs and the genitals—repeatedly, before sending him to a corner of the room. This caused his genitalia to become about 80% erect, supposedly to determine if the condition could be healed, claiming that if it became erect, healing was possible. The teacher then instructed him to continue until fully erect and to ejaculate onto the teacher’s face, then rub his genitalia on the teacher’s face before returning to sit on the bed to ask forgiveness for his karma.
During this, the teacher sat between Mr. A’s legs and instructed him to stroke his genitalia to see if it could still be healed. Mr. A said he told the teacher it probably wouldn’t get erect again as he had just ejaculated. The teacher then used a mobile phone to show pornography to stimulate him. When his genitalia became erect, the teacher orally stimulated it. Mr. A secretly recorded video evidence on his phone. He explained he did not flee immediately because the teacher’s house was very large, and he feared running away would endanger his mother who was with him. He was also uncertain if there were disciples guarding the entrance or if the teacher was armed, fearing his mother might be taken hostage.
However, before arriving, he did not know the teacher would use such methods. He sought treatment because he wanted to heal, having tried many medical facilities without success. He believed there was nothing to lose by seeing the teacher. Throughout the treatment, there was no mention of any fees.
“When I returned home in Chiang Mai, I told my girlfriend I no longer wanted to live and told my mother that I was in a very bad mental state,” Mr. A said.
After the incident, he ceased all contact with the teacher and is determined to pursue legal action fully, refusing to settle, out of concern for the safety of others who might have experienced similar situations or might seek treatment there in the future.
Mr. Ekaphop said he had initially coordinated with the Crime Suppression Division’s Investigation Unit 4 to investigate and press charges based on evidence. He affirmed they would pursue the case thoroughly to prevent the teacher from victimizing others again.