Clear images expose Cambodian soldiers planting anti-tank mines at Chong Bok, contradicting Cambodia's denial before evidence was presented to confirm the facts.
On 4 June 2026, reporters reported that military units operating in the Chong Bok area detected and photographed improvised anti-tank mines placed by Cambodian soldiers. These mines were positioned southwest of Hill 745, in front of Thai military positions. The Thai side formally protested to Cambodia seeking clarification on the incident.
Today (4 June), Cambodia responded in writing to the protest, denying any placement of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) near Hill 745. The letter stated they received Thailand's notice regarding the detection of IEDs in the Mombey area—known to the Thai side as "Chong Bok"—near Hill 745, and that they had investigated the matter.
Cambodia stated they carefully reviewed the information provided by Thailand, but based on the details received, they could not verify or confirm the origin, type, timing, or ownership of the devices, nor attribute them to any party involved.
Furthermore, Cambodia affirmed that its military has never participated in or supported any activities aimed at escalating tensions, threatening the other side, or undermining peace and stability along the Cambodia–Thailand border. They cited such acts as contrary to Cambodia's commitments to international law, maintaining peace, fostering good neighborly relations, and resolving issues through peaceful means.
Therefore, Cambodia rejected allegations that it was responsible for placing the explosive devices and maintained that direct communication and cooperation between both sides remain the best approach to resolving such issues.
In the same letter, Cambodia pledged to adhere strictly to existing agreements, including the joint General Border Committee (GBC) statement dated 27 December 2025. They reaffirmed their military’s commitment to preserving peace, security, stability, and mutual trust along the Cambodia–Thailand border through ongoing dialogue and collaboration.
However, although Cambodia’s response denied all responsibility and claimed it could not confirm the origin of the devices, the facts held by Thailand contradict this. Thai forces had clearly recorded images showing Cambodian soldiers placing the devices at the location, identified by their uniforms as personnel from the 21st Infantry Battalion, Region 2 of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces.
The photographic evidence raises serious questions about Cambodia’s denial. Why does Cambodia insist it cannot identify the source or responsible party when the images clearly document Cambodian troops placing improvised explosives in the area?