"Oysri," accompanied by her legal team and evidence, filed a complaint with the Crime Suppression Division to investigate the financial transactions of the "Good Deeds Foundation." They demand that "Boom Panadda" clarify the transparency of donation funds, address the issues surrounding the Phuket pool villa and the 50-million-baht contract work, and vowed to pursue every angle of the investigation without backing down until the truth is revealed.,
At 11:00 a.m. on 30 Oct 2026 GMT+7, at the Crime Suppression Division's reporting center, Ms. Boonyanuch Saengsri, known as "Oysri," owner of the Facebook fan page "Oysri and Friends," together with Mr. Thanakan Noipitak, legal committee member of Oysri and Friends Consulting Company Limited, and Mr. Phuwakorn Srinean, from HETA Ethics of Organizations Foundation and Media, acting as representatives of the victims, met with investigators at the Crime Suppression Division to request a full investigation into the operations and financial transactions of the Good Deeds Foundation, chaired by Ms. Panadda Wongpudi, also known as Boom Panadda.
Oysri revealed that today's visit was not intended as harassment or personal bias, as she had once donated 1,000 baht on 3 Dec 2025 CE to help flood victims in good faith. However, she later noticed irregularities, as the destination account name included the word "by" followed by the foundation chairperson's name, which may indicate it was not a direct foundation account as presumed.
Oysri further stated that the main issue they want authorities to urgently investigate is whether the public donation funds were used according to their intended purposes, especially concerning the construction of a pool villa in Phuket and a foundation building project in Pathum Thani worth up to 50 million baht. There remain unclear aspects about the contracting and contractor selection, questioning whether these projects truly serve the public or aid people as claimed. Additionally, suspicious transfers exceeding 500,000 baht each time to external individuals were found multiple times, raising questions if these transfers had proper approval from the foundation's board of directors.
Regarding Boom Panadda's claim that documents may have been forged or that she was unaware, Oysri believes that as foundation chairperson and organizational leader, she should closely supervise operations. If forgery did occur, she should present evidence to refute the claims. Oysri is willing to enter a fair legal process if the other party files countercharges, so that the truth can be revealed before investigators.
As for the temporary suspension of the foundation's operations, Oysri considers it an appropriate measure during the investigation but insists that all related donation accounts should immediately halt receiving funds to prevent public confusion. She also hinted at the mystery surrounding the so-called "Last Boss," urging society to watch for related behavior and connections. She said it awaits lawyer Decha Kittivitayanun's disclosure to clarify the full picture.
Mr. Thanakan stated that this case involves criminal offenses that cannot be settled privately, including fraud against the public, violations under the Computer Crime Act, and money laundering. The legal process must proceed to the prosecution and court stages. He affirmed that no one is above the law, whether a famous celebrity or a public figure.
Preliminary investigations found evidence suggesting foundation funds were used for personal benefit by building a pool villa. Questions were raised to the foundation about what public benefit such a pool villa provides, and leaders were urged to clarify this clearly.
Attorney Win added that more victims are coming forward continuously. Yesterday, one donor transferred 20,000 baht and a well-known lawyer from the Northeast donated 100,000 baht. More victims are expected to provide information. Also, investigations into the foundation construction site in Pathum Thani remain unclear about the actual builder, prompting a call for Boom to disclose details since these are public donation funds. Regarding "Khun Ae" stating in news programs that she is not involved with the foundation, evidence shows she only prepared a quotation but was not hired, so no contract has been established.
Addressing Boom's claim that the funds were used to build a house, not a pool villa, attorney Win clarified that misuse of donation funds from their intended purpose constitutes an immediate offense regardless of other factors. Boom's assertion of being unaware of the Phuket pool villa conflicts with photographic evidence presented by Decha Kittivitayanun on a news program, showing Boom visiting the site two to three times. Denial of knowledge is untenable. Oysri, as the victim, has properly filed a complaint and welcomes defamation lawsuits if the other party believes this is slander.
For the next steps, attorney Win said that next Monday, he and Oysri will go to the Government House to file a complaint with Prime Minister and Minister of Interior Anutin Charnvirakul, requesting an investigation into whether the foundation used donations appropriately. On Tuesday, they will submit a request to the Anti-Money Laundering Office to investigate money laundering allegations, and on Wednesday, they will petition the chairman of the parliamentary anti-money laundering committee to examine all aspects.
"We have just learned that several senior media personnel sit on the foundation's board, so we ask them to present evidence to investigators proving they were not involved with large fund disbursements. This includes advisors or lawyers who recently resigned. As legal professionals, they know that large fund transfers without meeting resolutions are unlikely. We will coordinate to bring in external individuals and major donors to provide testimony to the Crime Suppression Division," attorney Win concluded.